Subscribe to RSS Feed

  • Register
  • Log in

    Saturday
    5 July 2008

    August 22nd 2006 - The Beginning of the End?

    Bernard Lewis (aka. Bush’s Historian) the man who coined the term “clash of civilizations” is predicting that Iran will initiate a third world war or some sort of end of times conflict. You can read his absurdly bigoted, hypocritical and fanatical article on the Wall Street Journal op-ed site, August 22: Does Iran have something in store?.

    As an extremely cogent counter balance I present this article by Brian Whitaker of The Guardian, World to End August 22nd.

    Unsurprisingly, Bernard Lewis, brings religion into it. He demonizes the Muslim world making the bigoted claim that the Iranian President would happily allow his country and people to be destroyed because for him it’s a win-win situation. This is complete bullshit. It’s not in Iran’s best interest to allow a war of the magnitude suggested to start. It might be in the best interest of a certain few people here in the U.S. but I don’t think it’s in Iran’s. It certainly isn’t in the interest of the common man anywhere in the world.

    None of the governments involved in Middle Eastern politics have my sympathy - this includes the United States. I don’t know about you but I’m tired of these power hungry lunatics trying to manipulate us through scare tactics, fundamentalism, and black/white world views. Screw it - don’t believe it, don’t buy it, don’t play it, don’t choose it!

    It’s always the common man who suffers - the common man is who has my sympathy - not our taskmasters. And those who align themselves with the antiquated ideals of these nation states have my pity that they cannot see beyond the carrot being strung out in front of them. It’s up the common man to make sure we don’t get screwed over. No right, no left, no middle, just human.

    Frankly we should all (and I mean everyone in the world) get over it (our differences, our greed, our violence, etc.) There are more than enough resources in the world for everyone to live quite happily - see Critical Path by Buckminster Fuller for a realistic scenario of how it can be accomplished.  There’s no profit in it though.

    Enlightened interdependence* is what we should strive for - anything else is just fucking stupid (in which case we, as a species, probably deserve to wipe ourselves out.) It is also, in fact, much easier to achieve enlightened interdependence, than to maintain an endless struggle. Hell whether we want to or not we are all already interdependent.

    “The western hemisphere
    And all inside
    We learn
    Who is murdering the innocent
    They are children playing with guns
    They are children playing with countries
    Mining harbors, creating contras
    The games they play
    The lives they take
    They bank their money in the country
    They steal from the innocent
    A colonial trait
    That’s much too old
    The banks, the lives
    The profits, the lies
    The banks, the profits
    The lives, the lies
    I would call it genocide
    Any other word would be a lie”

    Minutemen, From Double Nickels on the Dime

    Related posts

    No CommentsContinue Reading

    History Repeating Itself

    On March 8, 1917, Lt. Gen. Stanley Maude issued a “Proclamation to the People of the Wilayat of Baghdad”. Maude’s Anglo-Indian Army of the Tigres had invaded and occupied Iraq - after storming up the country from Basra - to “free” its people from their dictators. “Our armies do not come into your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators,” the British announced.

    Read the article - Liberate? For centuries we’ve been ‘liberating’ the Mideast. Why do we never learn?

    Related posts

    No CommentsContinue Reading