Spoonamore Reveals the Plan to Steal the 2008 Presidential Election
Oct 1 at 10:10am by Jagwire X
A Diebold Election Systems, Inc. model AccuVote-TSx DRE voting machine with VVPAT attachment.
It may be crazy — or then again maybe not. I guess we will see come November 5th when all the “votes” are in.
New Spoonamore Interview - E-voting Machines are a National Security Threat
Last week, Velevet Revolution interviewed GOP Cyber security expert Stephen Spoonamore about the upcoming election and his testimony in the new Ohio litigation to take depositions of Karl Rove and others.
The video is posted in full below with ten short clips for You Tube viewing. This interview is so important and explosive that we urge everyone to watch it.
Spoonamore says that the GOP wanted e-voting to steal elections but now foreign governments will be hacking and the winner will be determined by the best hackers. He says that if the GOP wins the hacking competition, McCain will win 51.2 percent with three electoral votes over Obama, and it will be a stolen election.
Spoon also makes a crucial point about the people who have been implicated in much of the election theft: “They are religious extremists.” He names those who know about stolen elections, and he insists that the only way to protect this election is with paper ballots, hand-counted.
Check out this extraordinary interview after the jump.
Read the rest of this entry »
House Judiciary Votes to Cite Karl Rove for Contempt
Jul 30 at 12:12pm by Jagwire X
Contemptible Rove?
Karl Rove the smug and arrogant puppet master behind much of the Bush Administration’s policies and power has failed to respond to the authorized subpoenas in the matter of the US Attorney firings and the allegations of his interference in the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman.
The House Judiciary Committee, voting along party lines, had elected to push the motion for contempt to the full House of Representatives, where a straight majority vote will be necessary to formalize the contempt citation.
The House Judiciary Committee, decision is only a recommendation, and it is up to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to allow a final vote. It is unclear whether she would be so inclined. Rove has denied any involvement with Justice decisions, and the White House has said Congress has no authority to compel testimony from current and former advisers. If so he should have nothing to fear in answering the subpoenas.
Following the actions in the previous contempt citation the House Judiciary Committee filed suit in federal court, seeking an order compelling the US Attorney to proceed with the prosecution. However the case was assigned to federal judge John D. Bates, a staunch Bush ally who dismissed the Plame lawsuit, the Cheney Energy Task Force lawsuit, and the DNC’s lawsuit seeking a ruling by Federal Election Commission on John McCain’s attempt to withdraw from his campaign’s public financing commitments. He also upheld the validity of Bush’s signature on an a bill not properly passed in the same form by both houses of Congress.
The House’s earlier contempt citations were referred under the statutory contempt procedure to the US Attorney who declined to prosecute the cases, upon the instruction of both the White House and the Department of Justice. Given that the previous contempt citations were brought up in the framework of investigation into whether or not the White House or the Department of Justice improperly directing prosecution decisions of the US Attorneys, this would seem to be a flagrant ethics violation as well as conflict of interest.
The Judiciary vote is that point where the decision needs to be made as to which type of contempt violation occurred. Statutory contempt which gets referred for prosecution to the US Attorney, and may be subject to the same conflict of interest, or inherent contempt which can then be prosecuted by the House itself in a trial before the body.
I don’t really have much faith in the House pursuing statutory contempt. It seems to me the inhertent contempt is a more accurate charge in any event.
It’s a step in the right direction but I’d really like to see the House of Representatives step up to the plate and actually get something done for the people.
Rove’s True November 2nd Surprise
Oct 23 at 3:03pm by Anonymous
Karl Rove
It wasn’t Bill Clinton and it wasn’t Nader. It wasn’t Hillary Clinton nor Howard Dean. Neither Kucinich nor Al Gore. It was Karl Rove who awoke the sleeping giant of the American Left. Ironically, he doesn’t see this, which underscores why he’s not a genius—evil or otherwise. Rather, he’s a tragic fool who will be blamed for helping marginalize the GOP for the next 30 years. It’s amazing what Rove, an ardent student of history, cannot see. But bigger mistakes have been made in Western political history..
The Soviets for too much of the 1930s welcomed the rise of Nazi Germany. The Communists’ radicalized worldview told them their way would thrive even better in an industrialized Germany once Nazism – a mere symptom of capitalism – failed. The tragic punch line, of course, is that by the time Nazism really got itself going, the Russians couldn’t stop it without paying the price in millions of lives.
The lesson of this factoid isn’t about Communism nor Nazism as much as it is about human nature when blinded by ideology. It was a stunning miscalculation, as we’re seeing now with Rove’s assertion that he’s going to transform the Republicans into the majority party for the next 30 years. He’s not; he’s going to assure the GOP a minority status for a generation to come. Read the rest of this entry »
RECENT COMMENTS